So, after Googling Evelyn's name, I only found a few entries. One of which being on the ever so biased CTV site.

The only real pertinent information that I was able to find was Evelyn's autopsy report.

I guess that her entire case being sealed until Scott's trial is over escaped me initially, but when you read the autopsy report you feel the gravity if what is happening.

Evelyn's cause of death is unknown. She was noticeably pregnant, and required maternity clothes, which were in shreds when they found her in the bay. She was missing some portions of her extremities. THere were no marks of trauma to be found, no cuts on her bones or bullet marks. Her organs were mostly missing.
What did strike me is the lack of presence of barnacles or mineralization on her clothing or body or bones.
She was identified by DNA.

The similarity concerns me. Greatly.
I have never jumped up and down and insited on Scott's innocence, because I really believe that the entire case needs to be presented. My gut told me that he could have been guilty, but I have not seen anything to date that tells me that he is even guilty a little bit.
Seeing this reprt on Evelyn Hernandez's autopsy puts the icing on the cake for me. Her murder and remains resemble Laci's so much that the court decides to seal any portion of her case or investigation?
What a distortion of someone's rights.
I am disgusted.

Thes two cases are so simular...I can't understand why they sealed the files....and wouldn't allow
this in Scotts Trial....Do you think this....could be brought up for appeal issue?

The Hernandez case will not be the basis for appeal.  You would have to hit them in the head with a rock to get them to even listen to the body comparison.  Both were 7 1/2 to 8 months pregnant.  Both were headless torsos.  Both had the same legs and arm portion missing.  Both are found in the bay.